When lawmakers ask Chung Mong-gyu, president of the Korea Football Association, if he will serve a fourth consecutive term, Chung says, “I will think twice.” It has been a continuation of this pattern.
It was a question about pending issues in the National Assembly, where simple and frustrating questions and answers were repeated for a long time and no meaningful results were drawn.
Questions on pending issues at the Culture, Sports and Tourism Committee, which were held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul, from 10 a.m. on the 24th, did not end until around 8:30 p.m. The meeting was attended by Chung Mong-kyu, chairman of the Korea Football Association, as well as Hong Myung-bo, head coach of the national soccer team.
The controversy surrounding the Korea Football Association continued, including the controversy over the appointment of a national team coach, the issue of opening minus 60 billion won bank account without approval from the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism in the process of building the Cheonan Football Center, and attempts to buy a match-fixing point. In the meantime, controversy escalated as some said that Chung would seek to serve his fourth consecutive term.
Chairman Chung expressed his frustration over the controversy over a fourth term in office, the privatization of the livestock association, and the hindrance of the development of Korean soccer among the “Top 10 Reasons why Chairman Chung Mong-gyu should step down” proposed by Min Hyung-bae of the Democratic Party of Korea.
Kim Jae-won, a lawmaker of the Cho Kuk Innovation Party, then asked, “Isn’t the construction of the Cheonan Football Center a paving stone for four consecutive terms?” and “Can we promise the people that we will not serve four consecutive terms?”
Then Chairman Chung said, “I will think about my future,” and gave a wrong answer, saying, “I think history will evaluate it.” 토토사이트
Park Soo-hyun, a lawmaker of the main opposition Minjoo Party of Korea, expressed his disappointment and said to Chung, “If you are the leader of the organization, shouldn’t you tell him that you will take responsibility for the situation and step down?” However, Chung’s return was also the same and obvious answer: “I will give it some thought.”
When I asked a person who answered a question after deciding a sentence unconscionably, I couldn’t find another answer when I asked a fragmentary question such as “Are you going to serve 4 consecutive terms?” There was no meaningless repetition.
It was a “fatigued” question on pending issues in the National Assembly, where questions without substance and answers without sincerity were repeated.