The opponent’s sent-off foul ended in a yellow card, and even the precious first goal was canceled due to dubious reasons. The referee’s absurd decision that continued even after going through on-field review. Despite this, Gwangju FC finally won the match against Shanghai Shenhua, continuing its ascent to the Asian stage. Winning the match against Shanghai Shenhua was all the more exciting.
Gwangju, led by head coach Lee Jung-hyo, defeated Shanghai Shenhua 1-0 in the fifth round of the AFC Champions League Elite (ACLE) league stage held at Gwangju World Cup Stadium on Sunday. Shanghai Shenhua was the runner-up in the Chinese Super League this season, allowing only one loss (24 wins and five draws).
The Kuwaiti national referee’s dubious decision throughout the match also failed to dampen Gwangju’s momentum toward the Asian leadership. Even after communicating with the VAR judges and on-field reviews in which the referee himself checks the scene, there have been two judgments that cannot be understood.
The first scene in question came at the 42nd minute of the first half when a tight zero balance continued. It was the moment when a foreign player from Shanghai hit Park Tae-joon’s shin with a soccer shoe stud in a competition to secure the ball in the midfield. It could have caused serious injury.
He did not inevitably hit the ball while trying to win possession of the ball in a competitive situation. In scenes that appeared several times on slow screen, Mallet’s foot hit Park Tae-joon’s shin with a dangerous motion in an area unrelated to the ball. Gwangju players also made gestures that the opponent team intentionally stepped on the ball with soccer shoe studs, appealing that it was a dangerous situation.
The referee, who initially brought out a yellow card to Mallet, communicated with the VAR office and started an on-field review. It was clear that the scene that was shown through the broadcast screen was an even more dangerous foul. The referee, who had been replaying the scene for a long time, however, only gave the yellow card as it was in the original trial. For Gwangju, it was an embarrassing situation.
Even in the extra time of the first half, Gwangju’s first goal was canceled after an on-field review. Choi Kyung-rok crossed sharply from the right side of the penalty box to the gate, and Heo Yul finished with his left foot at the gate and shook the net.
Even when Choi Kyung-rok received the conversion pass, no one was offside when Choi Kyung-rok’s cross was headed for Heo Yul. The referee, however, pointed out the previous scene of Jung Ho-yeon’s counterattack after blocking the opponent’s ball in the midfield as a “foul” and canceled Gwangju’s score.
The problem was the referee’s on-field review process. First, the referee, who was watching Jung Ho-yeon’s competition video, made a gesture to hand it over to the time of the scoring situation as if there was no problem. The actual replay video also led to the situation where Choi Kyung-rok was receiving a pass and Heo Yul shooting moments. It was relatively clear that all of the Gwangju players were not offside in the situation where the score was made. Gwangju’s score seemed to be recognized as it was.
However, the referee canceled Gwangju’s score with Jeong Ho-yeon’s foul declaration. The score was canceled after the on-field review process was not carefully watched, and the score was canceled only after watching the entire follow-up situation. If the score should have been canceled due to Jeong Ho-yeon’s foul, there was no need to check the scoring scene that lasted for a long time. This was why Gwangju players, including Heo Yul, responded that they could not understand why the score was canceled.
In the end, Gwangju failed to break the balance despite its 7-1 advantage in ball possession and shooting number, which was close to 70 percent in the first half. It was all the more regrettable that the incomprehensible judgment on the two scenes could have had a decisive effect on the outcome. 카지노사이트
Gwangju was not swayed despite this. Asani, who was substituted in the 12th minute of the second half, shook the net just one minute after the substitution was introduced. Heo Yul connected a cross from the side with a header after a corner kick and Asani shook the net with a powerful left-footed shot. This time, the referee did not have any scene to take issue with.
Gwangju continued to lose concentration and repeatedly resisted pursuit of Shanghai during the remaining time. Consequently, Gwangju secured 1-0 victory in the final home game of this season’s official match with the referee’s whistle. At the ACLE League Stage, the team had four wins and one loss (12 points), ranking second by one point behind Vissel Kobe (13 points) of Japan, and is now one step closer to advancing to the round of 16.