With the promotion war of the K League 2 teams remaining on the last page, the misjudgment alert was dropped.
Hana Bank K League 2 2024 39 rounds will be held simultaneously at 6 stadiums at 2 p.m. on the 9th. Twelve teams, excluding Suwon Samsung, which played 36 games first, will meet in the final round of the regular league.
The winner of the K League 2 will be automatically promoted, and the runner-up will play the 11th-ranked team in the K League 1 in the promotion playoff. The third-ranked team in the third-ranked and fifth-ranked teams in the K League 2 will play the K League 2, and the winner will have a showdown with the 10th-ranked team in the K League 1 in the promotion playoff 2.
The battle for promotion is ongoing. While FC Anyang won the championship with one more game to go, Seoul E-Land (58 points) ranked second has secured at least a berth to the K League 2 playoffs. Others include South Chungcheong Province Asan (57 points), fourth-ranked Suwon Samsung (56 points), fifth-ranked Jeonnam Dragons (54 points), sixth-ranked Busan I’Park (53 points), and seventh-ranked Gimpo FC (51 points).
While each team is planning to nervously look at the number of cases and the results of other teams, at least the misjudgment should not determine the year’s farming.
Recently, the K League 2 has been embroiled in a controversy over misjudgment at the end of the season when competition for rankings is intensifying. At the 37th round match between Anyang and Jeonnam held at Anyang Sports Complex on March 29, both teams’ scores raised suspicions.
Anyang Yoo Jeong-wan scored the first goal in the 15th minute of the second half when the score was 0-0. Since then, Jeonnam strongly protested against the referee. In the scene before the score, Valdivia claimed to have been fouled by Lee Tae-hee and lost the ball. On the broadcast screen, Lee Tae-hee was seen stretching her left arm and pushing Valdivia down. Jeonnam’s protest was not accepted and Anyang’s score was recognized.
At the end of the game, Anyang and Jeonnam had mixed feelings. Yoon Jae-seok of Jeollanam-do scored a dramatic equalizer in the 48th minute of the second half. Controversy over the misjudgment also erupted in this scene. When the cross came up from the left, Jeonnam Lee Chang-hoon was in an obvious offside position. Lee Chang-hoon influenced the game by competing with Lee Young-jik in the header.
In the end, the two teams shared one point each in an unpleasant aftertaste. If Anyang lost, it still had to compete for the championship. If Jeonnam lost, the possibility of going to the playoffs could have been more difficult. It’s not just this. Teams that compete directly with both teams can also suffer from one point.
The 38th round match between Suwon Samsung and Ansan Greeners at Yongin Mir Stadium on the 3rd was also noisy due to the decision issue. Ansan was on the offensive in the extra time of the second half, trailing 1-2. The cross from the right side headed toward the gate. At that time, Suwon Samsung’s Cho Yoon-sung pulled Ansan Kang Soo-il’s uniform inside the penalty box and knocked it down.
Ansan players raised their hands and immediately protested. Video refereeing (VAR) was performed on the scene, but no penalty was declared. It is assumed, but if the penalty is declared and the game ends 2-2, Suwon Samsung will have 54 points, not 56. Naturally, going to the playoffs becomes more difficult. As expected, rival teams will have to suffer complaints. 메이저사이트
The Korea Football Association’s subcommittee on refereeing admitted that Yoon’s score in the Anyang-Jeonnam match was a misjudgment. All other scenes were based on his sincerity. When asked about his position on the misjudgment or disciplinary action against those involved, an association official said, “I understand that we will not disclose it separately.”
The association’s judging committee, which used to announce the results of subcommittee meetings for judging decisions in each round in the past, does not disclose the relevant information at some point. In the meantime, it is strictly prohibited for leaders or players to comment on decisions in official situations. If the team wishes to respect, responsible decisions and follow-up measures should also be made in a transparent manner. A team member’s run for a year should not end in vain, at least.